In the case of losses that exceed $1,000, who is responsible for appointing an investigating officer?

The responsibility for appointing an investigating officer in cases of losses that exceed $1,000 lies with the Installation Commander. This is because the Installation Commander has the authority and oversight necessary to handle significant financial issues and ensure that proper investigations are conducted. The appointment of an investigating officer is a critical step in addressing and resolving financial discrepancies; thus, it requires someone at the command level who can make decisions impacting the integrity and accountability of the unit's operations.

In contrast, while the Activity Manager and Resource Manager oversee the day-to-day operations and resource allocation within their respective areas, they do not possess the authority to initiate formal investigations for significant losses. The NAF Accounting Office primarily focuses on financial reporting and accounting duties, rather than being involved in the investigative process related to loss accountability, which further clarifies why the Installation Commander is the appropriate authority in this scenario.